The Cult of More: How Bodybuilding Sold You Volume and Pocketed Your Gains

Why the lifter most desperate to add sets is the one who can least afford them.

There is a particular kind of lifter in every gym, and you have very likely been one of them. They have trained for a few years. They were growing, and then one day they weren’t. The mirror went quiet. So they do the obvious thing, the thing that feels like character, the thing every magazine and every coach and every algorithm has spent decades training them to do.

They add.

More sets. More reps. A fourth session crowbarred into a week that already had three. An extra exercise for the lagging part, then another one after that, because if a bit of work is good then surely a mountain of it is a personality. They attack the plateau with volume the way you attack a jammed door with your shoulder, working on the firm assumption that the only thing wrong is that they haven’t hit it hard enough yet.

And they get worse.

Slowly, quietly, expensively worse. More tired, more sore, more hours spent under the strip lights, and less to show for it than the year they trained half as often and knew half as much. They have done precisely what the culture instructed, and the culture has walked them calmly off a cliff while applauding their work ethic the whole way down.

This is the central lie of modern bodybuilding, and it is such a comfortable lie that almost nobody examines it. The lie is that growth is earned, in the moral sense, and that more suffering therefore buys more muscle. Ten sets beat five. Two hours beat one.

The person who has to be peeled off the gym floor has done it properly, and the one who walked out after forty minutes was clearly slacking. It feels true because it flatters the Protestant bit of our brains that believes good things must be paid for in pain. And it sells magnificently, because exhaustion is infinitely scalable and a single hard set is not.

Your body, unfortunately, has not read the magazine. It does not care how tired you are. It cares about something far smaller, far more specific, and far easier to deliver than the cult of more would ever admit.

Where The Cult Came From

Before you can unlearn the cult of more, it pays to know who wrote its scripture, and when. So have a look at the lifters who built the foundations of this sport before the chemistry arrived.

John Grimek, the Monarch of Muscledom, never lost a contest in his life. He trained three days a week, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, full body, a handful of basic compound movements, and then he went home. Steve Reeves, who would go on to play Hercules and look more like a Greek statue than the statues did, trained the whole body in a session and rated getting stronger above getting pumped.

Reg Park, Arnold’s own hero, put it about as plainly as it can be put: if you want to get bigger, get stronger. Go back further, to Sandow and Hackenschmidt at the turn of the century, and you find the same thing. Brief, hard, infrequent, built on real food and progressive overload and not a great deal else.

These were not small men. Their physiques still look excellent seventy years later, which is more than you can say for most of what wins shows today.

Then something changed, and the timing of it is worth dwelling on. Anabolic steroids arrived in Western lifting in the mid-1950s, crossed into bodybuilding through the late 1950s and early 1960s, and by the 1970s the sport was unrecognisable. The full-body routine gave way to the body-part split. The handful of compound lifts swelled into a buffet of isolation work. The volume exploded. And the Weider publishing empire was right there to print every set of it, page after glossy page, sold to teenagers as the secret of the champions.

Here is the question nobody at the time thought to ask, because the answer was inconvenient for everyone making money. Why did the pros all discover high-volume training in the exact decade that the drugs became available? You can construct an innocent explanation if you try hard enough. The simpler reading is that the volume and the chemistry walked in together, and the chemistry was carrying the muscle.

I’ll be straight with you, because the argument only holds if I am. The picture is not perfectly clean. Leroy Colbert built 21-inch arms drug-free and swore his growth took off when he pushed his volume up, so the low-volume old-timers were never a unanimous club. But the dominant pattern of the pre-steroid era was unmistakably less work, more often, on the big lifts, and the great inflation of training volume tracks the arrival of the needle with a neatness that should make anyone selling you a thirty-set arm day rather nervous.

Correlation on its own is a weak hand, mind you. To know whether the volume ever truly mattered, you would need to peel the training apart from the chemistry and watch what each one does on its own. As it happens, somebody did exactly that.

The Confounder Nobody Could See, Including The Pros

In 1996, a researcher named Shalender Bhasin and his colleagues ran the experiment that should have ended the argument forever, and published it in the New England Journal of Medicine, which is not a website run by someone with a ring light.

They took 43 healthy men and split them into four groups. Placebo and no training. Placebo and training. Testosterone and no training. Testosterone and training. Six hundred milligrams of testosterone a week for ten weeks, which is a proper bodybuilder’s dose, and the trainers lifted three times a week.

The result is the most quietly devastating finding in the entire iron game. The men who took testosterone and never lifted a single weight gained more muscle and more lean mass than the men who trained hard with no drugs. The needle, sitting on a sofa, outbuilt the barbell.

Sit with what that means. Steroids do not work by letting you recover faster so you can train more, whatever the know-all at the gym desk tells you. They improve recovery a little, yes, and someone will say so in the replies, and they are welcome to their footnote. The headline is that the drugs build muscle through a pathway that runs almost entirely independent of the training. The muscle grows because the chemistry tells it to, more or less regardless of what you do in the gym.

Which leads to the cruellest part, the part that explains the last sixty years of bad advice. The enhanced lifter could not tell whether their training worked. They grew no matter what they did, so every programme they ran looked like a triumph. They did thirty sets and grew, and concluded the thirty sets were the cause, when the truth is they would have grown doing eight, or doing five, or doing their weekly shop.

The feedback loop between method and result had been quietly severed by the syringe, and they never knew. Then they wrote it all down, and a natural teenager bought the magazine and ran the routine of someone whose results had nothing to do with the routine.

You are very possibly still running it.

The Signal Is Small, And It Is Not What You Think

So if it isn’t the heroic volume, what actually grows a muscle?

Mechanical tension. High force, experienced by the muscle fibre, sensed at the cellular level, and converted into an instruction to build. The fibre is studded with mechanosensors that detect strain and fire off the anabolic machinery in response. That is the lever. Tension is the only thing that pulls it.

And tension of the right magnitude lives in a very small window. When you lift a weight that is genuinely hard, the meaningful tension arrives in the last few reps before failure, the ones where the bar slows down whether you like it or not. That involuntary slowing matters. It means your nervous system has called up every motor unit it has, including the big high-threshold ones that drive the fast-twitch fibres, and those fibres are now generating maximal force against a load that refuses to move quickly. That is the growth signal. A handful of reps, deep in a hard set, doing the actual work.

Everything before those reps is the toll you pay to reach them. Necessary, but not the product.

This is also where two of the gym’s most beloved idols quietly die. The first is the pump. The pump is a receipt for work done, blood and fluid crowding into the muscle, and it feels tremendous, and it builds precisely nothing on its own. You can pump a muscle to bursting with twenty soft sets and send almost no growth signal at all. The pump is the gym equivalent of a loud engine. Impressive noise, tells you nothing about whether you’re moving.

The second idol is soreness. People chase the ache the next day as if it were proof of growth, when mostly it is proof of damage, and damage is a cost rather than a cause. Worse, repairing damage competes for the same recovery budget that would otherwise go on building new tissue. The session that leaves you crippled for four days has not done more for you. It has just sent you a bigger bill.

Junk Volume And The Fatigue That Buries You

Now we can name the thing that’s actually wrong with the cult of more.

If only the last few hard reps carry the growth signal, then most of the extra volume you pile on does not add signal. It adds fatigue. You are not topping up the stimulus. You are filling the tank with sludge.

And fatigue is not a neutral tax. It accumulates, within a session and across a programme, and it has a specific and ruinous habit. It locks you out of the very fibres you came to train. The fast-twitch fibres, the Type II fibres, are where the growth worth having actually lives. They are the ones with the headroom, the ones that get big.

The slow-twitch fibres do grow a little, but they have a low ceiling and they are worked all day long just by you existing and walking about, so there is barely any headroom left in them to chase. The prize is in the fast-twitch pool. And reaching that pool requires high force, which requires freshness. Bury yourself in fatigue and you simply cannot generate the output needed to recruit and properly load those fibres. You grind out set after set, feeling like a hero, while the only fibres that were ever going to grow sit politely out of reach.

This is the lifter we started with. They met a plateau and answered it with more, and every extra set they bolted on was another shovelful of fatigue heaped over the fibres they were trying to reach. Their problem was never a shortage of effort. The effort itself, piled too high, was the thing burying the result.

New To Carnivore?

Get my Carnivore Guide — free.

Send Me The Book

Certain things dig the fatigue hole faster than others, and the cult loves all of them. Endless sets to absolute failure, deep into the territory where you’re recruiting fast-twitch tissue and then frying it. Big loaded stretches under heavy weight. And the great fashionable waste of time, the slow grinding lowering phase, the four and five-second negative performed in the belief that more time under tension means more growth.

It does not. The lowering phase produces the most muscle damage of any part of the lift. The research is unambiguous on this: the eccentric portion disrupts far more fibres than the lifting portion, and after a bout of heavy eccentric work, strength stays depressed for three to four days, against about one day for concentric work. A muscle is thirty to fifty per cent stronger lowering a weight than lifting it, which means that on the way down it is always working well within itself, never straining anywhere near its true limit.

Low relative effort means a weak growth signal, and no amount of slowing the descent will change that. You cannot make a muscle work hard by asking it to do something easy very slowly. So the slow negative buys you no extra signal and a great deal of extra damage. You are paying full price for the part of the rep that grows the least. Two or three seconds is plenty to keep the weight under control. Anything longer is just self-harm with good posture.

The Advanced Lifter’s Trap

Here is the cruel twist, and it is aimed directly at the frustrated, experienced lifter reaching for more.

The better you get, the less you can recover from a hard session, not more. This sounds backwards, so follow the chain. A trained lifter has spent years learning to recruit their high-threshold motor units, the switches that bring the big fast-twitch fibres into play, fully and on demand, something a beginner simply cannot do. They have also preferentially grown their fast-twitch tissue, so there is more of it.

Fast-twitch fibres are structurally fragile and take the brunt of high-force and eccentric work, so they damage easily. Put it together: the advanced lifter, in a genuinely hard session, recruits and damages a far larger mass of fragile, slow-to-repair tissue than a novice ever could. Their hard sets are more potent and more expensive, both at once.

So the conventional wisdom, the one preaching that you must keep adding volume as you advance, has it exactly upside down. The advanced lifter does not need more. They need to respect that each productive set now costs them more, and budget accordingly.

A sharp critic will reach for the obvious objection here, so let me bury it before it gets up. The repeated bout effect is real: trained muscle is well armoured against damage from a stimulus it has met before, and the workout that wrecks a novice barely registers on a veteran. True. But that armour is against the familiar, easy work.

The moment the advanced lifter trains at the intensities and proximities to failure that actually move the needle at their level, they are back to damaging that big mass of fragile fast-twitch tissue, and the armour thins. The ceiling drops precisely for the hard, productive work, while the easy stuff stays cheap. The exception proves the rule rather than breaking it.

And the beginner? The beginner can get away with murder, which is the final irony. Their neural drive is poor, so they can’t fully reach their own fast-twitch pool, which means each set does less damage and digs a shallower hole. On top of that, an untrained body grows off almost any honest stimulus at all. So the lifter who could tolerate the most volume is the one who needs it least, and the lifter convinced they need more is the one it ruins. The reflex runs backwards from start to finish.

Less, Applied Harder, More Often

If the signal is small and fatigue is the enemy, the prescription writes itself, and it looks nothing like a bodybuilding magazine.

Train a muscle hard enough to send the signal, which takes remarkably few sets. One to four hard sets, taken close to failure, will do it. Then stop. You have sent the message. Standing there sending it eleven more times does not make it louder, it just runs up the recovery bill.

If your gut is now shouting that this will leave you smaller, hear me out, because that fear is exactly what keeps people trapped in the cult. You will not shrink by doing less; you will grow, precisely because you can finally recover from the work, turn up fresh, and put weight on the bar instead of hauling week-old fatigue into every session. The lifter doing four hard sets and walking out is the one quietly out-growing the one still grinding away behind them, and they are doing it with their evenings handed back.

Then, and this is the half everyone misses, train it again soon. Muscle protein synthesis, the building response, climbs after a session, runs elevated for roughly a day to two, and then falls back to baseline. The fitter you are, the faster it fades. Once it has dropped back, that muscle is idle, doing nothing for your physique.

Why would you leave it sitting idle for six days waiting for “chest day” to come round again? Hit it once it has settled, every two to four days, and you keep yourself in the building state far more of the time. Low per-session volume, high frequency, a muscle stimulated little and often rather than blitzed once and abandoned.

The one variable you guard with your life is progressive overload. The weight on the bar, the reps you get with it, climbing over weeks and months. That is the only honest scoreboard in the building. The pump fades within the hour, the soreness within days, and neither tells you a thing. The logbook does not lie. If the numbers are going up, the muscle is being asked to do more, and it will build to meet the demand. If the numbers are flat, then no quantity of sets, no depth of soreness, no biblical pump, has done you any good at all.

And to be very clear, because the gatekeepers will try to make this complicated: none of this demands a barbell and a martyr’s grimace. Machines build muscle. Isolation work builds muscle. A cable and a sensible amount of effort builds muscle. Tension is tension, and the fibre cannot read the label on the equipment. Use whatever lets you put high tension through the target with the least fuss and the least wreckage. That is the entire game.

The Discipline Of Doing Less

Here is why almost nobody does this, even when they’ve read every word of the science.

Doing less feels like cheating. Walking out of the gym with reps left in the tank, after four working sets, feels like you haven’t earned the right to your dinner. The ego wants the suffering. It wants the two-hour epic, the trembling walk to the car, the visible evidence of a war fought. Restraint offers none of that. It offers a quiet, almost embarrassing efficiency, and then it asks you to trust it and go home.

The lifter who can do four hard sets and walk away has mastered something the two-hour grinder never will. They train like a sniper rather than someone emptying a magazine into the dark and calling the noise commitment. They have stopped using the gym to prove they are a hard worker, and started using it to grow.

Where This Argument Ends

I’d be selling you a different cult if I pretended volume does nothing, so let me draw the lines honestly, because naming the limits of an argument is the most persuasive thing in it.

Volume does matter, up to a point. The dose-response research, Schoenfeld and others, shows that across a population more sets generally do produce more growth, roughly a fraction of a percent of extra hypertrophy per added weekly set, with ten-plus weekly sets beating a handful. That is real, and one or two sets to failure forever is not the secret either. There is a floor below which you genuinely are not doing enough.

But the same research shows the returns diminish fast, and that at the top end you hit a plateau, and quite possibly a downturn, where piling on more volume starts to cost you growth rather than buy it. Effort and proximity to failure appear to matter more than raw set-counting. Recovery capacity varies enormously between people, by genetics, by sleep, by age, by stress, by how much real food you’re eating. There is no single perfect number, and anyone who hands you one is guessing in a lab coat.

The point was never that less is a magic figure. The point is the direction of the error. The lifter who hits a wall and reaches for more volume is, nine times in ten, already past their own peak and accelerating into the part of the curve where extra work makes things worse. Their instinct is precisely wrong at precisely the moment it feels most right.

So the next time the mirror goes quiet, fight the reflex to add. Strip it back instead, train the hard sets that actually count, send the signal and leave it alone long enough to answer. You came to grow a body, not to prove you could endure a punishment. Bring intent. Leave the sleeping bag at home.

Carnivore Foundations

The essential reads for anyone stepping into the world of meat-based nutrition.

• The Ultimate Checklist For Starting Carnivore
• FAQ – What To Eat On A Carnivore Diet
• 10 Mistakes You’ll Want To Avoid On The Carnivore Diet
• Why You Don’t Need Salt On Carnivore
• The 10 Best Foods On The Carnivore Diet
• Anxiety On Carnivore

If you want to put together your own metabolic revival, follow me on Twitter or Instagram, or find out what the coaching programme involves below.